Browsing: Scouts

The Canucks started the season without the services of centre Teddy Blueger, but once he returned to the lineup Vancouver seemed relatively solid down the middle of the ice with Elias Pettersson, Filip Chytil, Blueger and either Max Sasson or Aatu Raty.

Unfortunately for the Canucks, they canâ€t seem to escape the injury bug. Bluegerâ€s return to the lineup lasted only two games and Chytil is on the shelf with what appears to be a likely concussion after absorbing a massive hit from Washingtonâ€s Tom Wilson. Other players in sick bay include Jonathan Lekkerimaki, Nils Hoglander and Derek Forbort. Itâ€s hard to believe, but things might have just gone from bad to worse with captain Quinn Hughes suffering a lower body injury on the weekend and missing the game Sunday night versus the Edmonton Oilers.

With injuries adding up Vancouver acquired forward Lukas Reichel from the Chicago Blackhawks last Friday. The fact it only cost Vancouver a 2027 fourth-round pick might be surprising — or alarming — considering Reichel was drafted in the first round (17th overall) by Chicago in 2020. But the reality is that things weren’t working out for him there and he needed a change of scenery.

The much-needed new start will come in Vancouver and, after two games in his new uniform, here’s a look at what Reichel can potentially provide the Canucks.

Reichelâ€s pro career has produced high end impact at the AHL level (42G-74A in 121GP) but inconsistent results at the NHL level (22G-36A in 176GP)

Having said that, I was confident enough in his upside to provide the following report in the fall of 2023 after a game between Chicago and Boston:

“Reichel is a skilled forward who is averaging just over 14 minutes of ice time per game to start the season with the Hawks. All of his shifts come at even strength and the power play. Heâ€s playing quick and fast and is a threat with the puck on his stick in transition. His speed backs opponents off their blue line and allows for generally clean offensive zone entries for his group. Leans shooter more than distributor and has to take better advantage of open lanes to the net instead of directing pucks on goal from the perimeter. His defensive detail ranges, not because he doesnâ€t arrive on time, but more due to lack of awareness/responsibility to lock onto his man. At the end of the day his offensive upside wins out. Reichel could end up as a middle-six option for Chicago as he matures.â€

• Reichel isnâ€t going to overwhelm opponents with his physical play (he’s 6-foot, 170 pounds) but his speed allows him to arrive in all three zones on time and usually ahead of schedule. Heâ€s rated in the 96th percentile when it comes to max skating speed (23.04 mph) according to NHL EDGE.

• Although Reichelâ€s detail in terms of engaging properly in the defensive zone ranges at times, Iâ€ve noticed improved awareness recently with some of his defensive sequences resulting in zone exits that lead to scoring chances for his group.

Hereâ€s an example of what Iâ€ve noticed more often from Reichel in the defensive zone:

Reichel suited up for the Canucks on very short rest after being traded from Chicago. I thought his energy and overall engagement was generally sound for his first game in Vancouver on Saturday night and he carried it over with a consistent effort Sunday night versus the Oilers.

Hereâ€s an example of Reichel executing responsibly on and off the puck in his Canucks debut against the Montreal Canadiens this past Saturday. He extends the play on the half-wall and makes sure he is above the Canucks’ pinching defenceman for support. He’s in solid position in the neutral zone to regroup for another potential offensive zone entry:

What the Canucks need from Reichel

First and foremost, they need Reichel to evolve offensively. He is capable of generating more scoring chances with his speed and skill. Iâ€m of the belief that Reichel had lost his confidence in Chicago. His shot volume, and overall scoring chances, reflect a skill forward who isnâ€t using his attributes to the best of his ability.

Hereâ€s a look at how many shots on goal Reichel has generated so far this season. Heâ€s clearly more comfortable directing plays to the net from his strong side, but Iâ€m hoping he’ll become more aggressive driving to the middle of the ice with the Canucks.

(Note: These statistics are provided by NHL EDGE)

The Canucks only have one centreman with a face-off wining percentage above 50 (Raty). Elias Pettersson has taken the most draws of any Vancouver centre, but heâ€s only winning around 42 per cent of his draws. If the team expects Reichel to play centre long-term he will need to improve in the face-off circle, especially on his weak side. Hereâ€s a look at Reichelâ€s success rate taking face-offs so far this season:

Some positives came out of the Sunday versus Edmonton in terms of Reichelâ€s overall game. He was deployed for a season-high 16:33 and rewarded the Canucks with much better results in the face-off circle.

There are players scattered throughout the NHL who, for whatever reason, didnâ€t find success with the team that drafted them. Sometimes the fit simply isnâ€t there and the surroundings donâ€t agree with the prospect.

I believe Reichel can provide more offence than he has shown so far in his NHL career. While with Chicago, there were several times when he was deployed less than 10 minutes per game and his confidence had to have taken a hit in the process. It appears as though Vancouver is willing to give him a chance to develop into the player many teams, not just the Hawks, thought he could become when he was drafted 17th overall in 2020.

The Vancouver Canucks didnâ€t have to invest much to acquire 23-year-old Reichel from Chicago. He became a diminishing asset, but he now has a chance to reset his young career and the Canucks are a team desperate for more impact from Reichel as they work through the injuries that have impacted the group to start the season.

Source link

MONTREAL — The only people who abhor small sample sizes more than data analysts are scouts. No matter how telling first impressions generally are, itâ€s their job to avoid putting too much stock into them.

They donâ€t jump to conclusions; they pedantically inch their way toward arriving at them, building profiles of players over multiple viewings. And they donâ€t complete those profiles without balancing their own opinions with data and intelligence they collect through conversations with anyone they can track down whoâ€s close enough to a player to offer the context that would enable the deepest possible analysis.

And so, it was expected that a few of them might groan at the thought of having their early takes on Ivan Demidov published following the playerâ€s 17th NHL game (regular season and post-season combined).

But, for your benefit, they agreed to play along — though only after being granted anonymity.

Five of them currently work for other teams, so putting their names next to their analyses wouldâ€ve been a non-starter.

The other two are hockey lifers Iâ€ve been leaning on for analysis for the bulk of my 17 years covering the NHL. The first played nearly 1,000 games in the league, and the second is a master scout who has also served in nearly every other front-office capacity over four-plus decades in the league.

Combining their expertise with that of the five scouts we ran into at Canadiens games in Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver this past week, a comprehensive assessment of Demidov was built despite the 19-year-old phenomâ€s minuscule NHL sample size.

It was telling how little disparity there was in the answers to the three-question survey, especially with each participant not privy to what the others had to say.

1. Who does Demidov remind you of (past or present players) and why?

2. What stands out to you most about his game?

3. What will he need to work on most to reach his ceiling as fast as possible?

Here are the answers, edited slightly for clarity and flow.

1. I don’t like comparison because it’s not fair to the player, but he has some of the good parts of Mitch Marner and Alex Kovalev when they started in the league. But, at the same time, he’s different from those two players in his compete level and strength at his age.

2. Patience, puck skills, and the willingness to want the puck on his stick in big moments of the game. Not intimidated by the moment.

3. Needs to get stronger, learn the defensive game, learn how to play predictably in his own zone — being structured, disciplined and consistent in your defensive habits so that your teammates (and even coaches) can anticipate what youâ€ll do to allow the defensive unit to rely on each other when chaos inevitably ensues in the D-zone. Predictable defenders stay on top of pucks, stay within system structures, and they donâ€t chase the play. As usual, young players take time to become consistent at this, but consistency in this department is key for a player to hit on his star potential.

1. Demidov reminds me of Pavel Datsyuk, and not because of his skating but really because of his deceptiveness one-on-one and his ability to create space for himself and his teammates.

2. His one-on-one battles and his will to win them.

3. I think his skating. For how strong he is, he could and will become faster.

1. Offensively, he reminds me of Pavel Datsyuk. Not only by the way they are always on their inside edges when they have the puck, but in the way the brain, hands and feet are all working together to manipulate defenders and make plays. Similar quick and smooth handles with the puck, with great range and body control.

2. Demidovâ€s skill level and passing ability are off the charts. Already one of the most skilled and best passers in the NHL. Uses great deception and patience to open lanes to execute on high-end plays all over the offensive zone.

3. One area I think that he needs to improve to be one of the best offensive players in the NHL is his shot. Would like to see him be more of a shot threat. Having a one-timer from the flank or a shot that he can score from range would complete his offensive game.*

*This scouting report was filed before Demidov scored on a one-timer from mid-range in Montrealâ€s 4-3 win over the Canucks on Saturday.

1. A harder-working version of fellow Russian Evgeny Kuznetsov. Itâ€s the east-west movement and the willingness to try anything with no fear.

2. Puck skills and skating to move east-west. His bravery to try anything.

3. Defensive-board play, and learning he has to shoot more when heâ€s in a great spot rather than passing to a player who might be in a worse spot than him.

1. He reminds me a little of Paul Kariya in how elusive Paul was with the puck in tight areas. He was a great passer. Think 2002 Olympics with Mario Lemieux and his on-ice relationship with Teemu Selanne. Both players are masters of deception and precision.

2. His puck-possession skills are substantial. Can hold the puck a little longer in tight areas, a lot like what Peter Forsberg would do. Demidov does that so well, and that allows his teammates to break free from coverage and have better scoring opportunities.

3. He will need to work on his ability to chip pucks out of his own zone when defencemen pinch down on him. He will also need to work on his one-timing skills and developing a shot-first mentality when scoring opportunities become available.*

*This response also came before the Vancouver game.

• 
• NHL on Sportsnet

  Livestream Hockey Night in Canada, Scotiabank Wednesday Night Hockey, the Oilers, Flames, Canucks, out-of-market matchups, the Stanley Cup Playoffs and the NHL Draft.

  Broadcast schedule

1. Skates like Macklin Celebrini. Brain and talent like Pavel Datsyuk. Some Nikita Kucherov in him when set up on the half-wall on the PP.

2. Offensive instincts. High-end skill and talent level.

3. Heâ€ll need to get physically stronger and gain experience. You still need to be patient for those things, in my opinion.

Combining 1. and 2.: What stands out most about his game is his offensive acumen, his instincts, his feel, and his high-end talent. The puck seems to find him constantly in the offensive zone. His elusiveness and creativity are special. You donâ€t see a lot of players with that innate ability to find space and distribute pucks in tight, especially with the attention he draws from opponents. He can beat you in lots of ways when the confidence is rolling; he’s a deceptive shooter and playmaker, the likes of Kirill Kaprizov, Nikita Kucherov, Artemi Panarin and Elias Pettersson (when heâ€s at the top of his game).

3. Tough, based on a limited viewing of the player, to evaluate his barriers/limitations to growth. But Martin St. Louis will need to be able to trust him defensively against top players with the little details. Seems like heâ€s given quality offensive-zone starts and opportunities, but struggled to transition the game out of his own zone under pressure, which is common for young, learning, high-end offensive players who will focus on production and stats rather than the “details†that help you win.

With that being said, Demidov has the swagger and confidence to pull others into the fight with him offensively. If he can continue to improve his defensive systems and details, he has the makeup of an elite player in this league.

Source link

It’s complicated.

That’s one of two consensus opinions I found in speaking with six scouts/executives from different teams about the Tarik Skubaltrade speculation that has become the talk of the baseball industry over the last 48 hours.

At least it was the talk before Shohei Ohtani’s sublime performance late Friday night, but in a way, the stories are connected, especially for a team like the Mets, who need someone like Skubal to have a chance at competing with the Los Angeles Dodgers for baseball supremacy in 2026 and beyond.

More on that to come. For now, the larger point, as the scout/execs point out, is that the Detroit Tigers are in a very difficult position. They would be risking the wrath of their championship-starved fan base if they trade Skubal, arguably the best pitcher in baseball, after reaching the postseason the last two years, yet they’d almost certainly lose him to free agency a year from now if they choose not to trade him.

“That’s why it’s hard to predict which way this thing will go,” said an executive from a mid-market NL team. “In a vacuum, it’s a no-brainer, unfortunately, considering Skubal is a (Scott) Borasguy and all that. You make the best trade you can and move on. But in the real world, that’s a tough sell when you haven’t won in 40 years.”

It’s 41 years, actually, since the Tigers won the World Series in 1984. And there is another layer to their conundrum.

For years, the late Mike Ilitch, the Tigers’ owner, operated with one of the higher payrolls in baseball while trying to win another title, spending big in free agency and once locking up Justin Verlander to a seven-year, $180 million extension that at the time was the highest in the game. But Ilitch died in 2017 and his son, Christopher, has run a more budget-conscious operation since taking over.

“It’s kind of like Hal(Steinbrenner) taking over after George died,” said one midwest-based scout. “The fans there long for the days when they felt like Mike Ilitch would spend whatever it took to try to win. The son is not very popular as it is. Trading Skubal would make him persona non grata in Detroit.”

In short, this isn’t Garrett Crochet, who was traded for prospects last winter by the rebuilding Chicago White Sox, or even Corbin Burnes, traded by the small-market Milwaukee Brewers from a team that had enough pitching depth to continue winning.

Skubal is far more essential than that to the Tigers and the city of Detroit.

Oct 5, 2025; Seattle, Washington, USA; Detroit Tigers pitcher Tarik Skubal (29) pitches against the Seattle Mariners in the seventh inning during game two of the ALDS round for the 2025 MLB playoffs at T-Mobile Park / Steven Bisig-Imagn Images

Still, the same scouts and execs don’t rule out a trade. For it to happen, however, it would take a more attractive package than either Crochet or Burnes brought back.

Which leads to the second consensus opinion that emerged from my various conversations: That is, no team is more motivated or well-positioned than the Mets to make such a trade happen.

“I’d make them the favorite to get Skubal, no question, if the Tigers decide to trade him,” said an NL scout. “They have the pieces to get it done and they obviously have the need. Steve Cohen apologized to the fans for missing the postseason — what does that tell you? He’s going to want to make big-splash moves to change the narrative.”

To that point, SNY’s Andy Martino reported Friday the Mets are expected to be “involved” if Skubal is made available, and willing to “shake up their current position-player group” if it means acquiring a top pitcher.

So the question on the Mets’ end would be just how far they’re willing to go for a player they could lose to free agency after one season.

“Steve Cohen changes that equation,” said one team exec. “His money takes significant risk out of losing the player. And when you look at the Mets, as badly as they played down the stretch, they’re still talented enough that a pitcher like Skubal could be the difference-maker that gives them a chance to compete with the Dodgers and win it all next year.

“But I’d still expect them to draw a line somewhere as to how much they’d be willing to give up, knowing they could sign Skubal in a year without giving up assets.”

So what would it take? The scouts/execs all made the point that this has to be more than trading prospects, as the Tigers, even without Skubal, would go into next season trying to win, with the core of a team that had the best record in baseball until a September collapse.

“They would want players who could help them win next season, plus prospects too,” said a team exec. “They’re going to ask for (Nolan) McLean. He’s a guy you can sell to your fans as a rising star who can be another Skubal. You get him with some other pieces and maybe your fans can live with it.

“But if I’m the Mets, McLean is the one untouchable. The ceiling is too high and you have him under control for six years. Other than that, it’s finding the right combination of players on your major league roster and top prospects.”

Sep 18, 2025; Detroit, Michigan, USA; Detroit Tigers pitcher Tarik Skubal (29) pitches in the sixth inning against the Cleveland Guardians at Comerica Park. / Rick Osentoski – Imagn Images

Scouts identified catcher Francisco Alvarez, third baseman Brett Baty, and lefty starter David Peterson as possibilities the Tigers would want off the major league roster.

One suggested Clay Holmes as well.

The prospects in demand, other than McLean, figure to be pitchers Brandon Sproat and Jonah Tong, infielder Jett Williams, first baseman Ryan Clifford, and outfielder Carson Benge.

“It has to be some combination of those players,” said a scout.

Two players sparked much debate among the scouts/execs: Alvarez and Benge.

“Other than pitching, Alvarez could be the key,” one exec said. “It depends how the Tigers’ scouts evaluate him. He showed some growth after the Mets sent him to Triple-A, but is he still a 30-home run guy as he was projected to be when he came up? As a catcher, that would make him a difference-maker and something to help justify the trade from a PR standpoint.

“If you’re the Mets, you have to make the same evaluation. Is it worth giving up a catcher who’s still young (Alvarez turns 24 in November)? I’d have a hard time doing that, on top of what else you’d have to put in the deal.”

Then there is Benge, the minor leaguer who could be the long-term answer to filling the Mets’ hole in center field. Scouts love him for his athleticism and advanced approach at the plate.

“He has a chance to be a .300 hitter with power who can play center field,” one scout said. “How many of those guys are there in the game these days? If I’m the Mets, I’m doing everything I can to keep him.

“You know you’re going to have to give up pitching, probably either Tong or Sproat, plus Peterson. And you can live with giving up Jett Williams. But Benge could be special offensively and he fills a big need for the Mets.”

The bottom line is the scouts/execs believe the two teams could find enough common ground on a trade package to make it work if the Tigers become committed to making a deal. But only two of the six people I spoke to think the chances of it happening are more than 50-50.

The other four think it’s far more likely the Tigers will listen but ultimately decide that Skubal is worth more, even for one more season, than what the Mets or anyone else is offering.

“I just don’t think they’d want to deal with the uproar it would cause among their fans,” one exec said. “That’s a very real factor, especially when you haven’t won a championship in so long and the public perception is that Skubal gives them a chance next year.

“But I’ll say this: if the Mets are willing to go the extra mile, in terms of what they’d give up, they could make it awfully tempting for the Tigers to ignore all the outside noise and decide, let’s do it.”

Source link

Los Angeles Clippers guard James Harden might have to play himself into peak condition when the regular season begins next week.

On the latest episode of The Hoop Collectivepodcast (starts at 25:40 mark), ESPN’s Brian Windhorst explained that Clippers scouts have said Harden “is not even in that great of shape” right now:

“I think the Clippers look spectacular. I thought they looked spectacular down the stretch last year. And I know that they made some changes to their roster. And I know that they’re older and they’re going to have injuries. And look, James Harden is actually not even in that great of shape. That’s one of the things that the scouts have said, is that Harden has been in better shape at this point. But Kawhi looks fabulous.”

The results for Harden in the preseason have left a lot to be desired. He averaged 6.0 points on 36.8 percent shooting, 7.7 assists and 3.3 rebounds per game in three starts.

It’s not a huge surprise that Harden is not in peak shape going into the regular season. He admitted two years ago that he was playing himself into “James Harden shape,” though that was also when his offseason and preseason schedule was out of whack due to his standoff with the Philadelphia 76ers.

Even starting that season missing time early until he was traded to the Clippers and not being in peak shape, Harden still played in 72 games. He averaged 16.6 points on 38.1 percent three-point shooting and 8.5 assists per contest.

While the 36-year-old may not be at his peak at this point of his career, Harden is still one of the best players of his generation when he is healthy and on the floor.

His resume includes the 2017-18 MVP, three scoring titles, two assist titles, eight All-NBA selections, 11 All-Star Game nods and a spot on the NBA’s 75th Anniversary Team, but it is missing a championship.

The Clippers have backcourt reinforcements if Harden needs more rest in games early in the season. They have Chris Paul, Kriss Dunn and Bradley Beal on the roster.

Harden and the Clippers will open the 2025-26 regular season on Wednesday against the Utah Jazz.

Source link

The WWBA World Championship in Jupiter, Fla. once again lived up to its reputation as the ultimate proving ground for prep talent. While the weekend featured plenty of familiar, headline draft names, it also served as a launching pad for a group of under-the-radar players who either showed off exciting tools or delivered true breakout performances.

This list focuses on that second group—the prospects who may not yet be household names in the draft community but left lasting impressions with evaluators.

All but one player on our list is already committed to a college program, and most project as legitimate candidates to reach campus. Together, they represent the next wave of impact talent—players whose performances in Jupiter hinted at much bigger things ahead, be it in college or as a young pro starting next summer.

Cody Boshell, 1B/OF, Florida

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Tennessee

A physically imposing 6-foot-3, 220-pound lefthanded hitter, Boshell looked every bit the part of a power bat thanks to real strength through his frame and a barrel chest that suggested durability. Though primarily a first baseman, he moved well enough to project as a viable corner outfielder if needed.

At the plate, Boshell worked from a simple load with above-average hand speed and plenty of bat strength. His swing could get a touch long at times, but the bat path stayed direct enough to allow his natural power to play. The ball jumped off his barrel with carry to all fields, and he showed the ability to drive it out of the park, as evidenced by a home run he launched during a 4-for-12 showing in Jupiter.

Boshellâ€s hands worked fast through the zone, and his overall approach was aggressive. Continued emphasis on staying compact will be key as he faces better velocity, but the ingredients for middle-of-the-order power were already clear. He also pitched, though his future almost certainly lies with the bat, where his combination of physicality, athleticism and strength gives him impact potential.

Jorhan Castro, C, Puerto Rico

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Western Kentucky

Though undersized at 5-foot-10, 180 pounds, Castro impressed as arguably the most polished defensive catcher at the showcase. Multiple evaluators singled him out as the premier receiver in Jupiter, citing his advanced feel, quiet movements and leadership behind the plate against opposing lineups loaded with high-end players.

Castro showed a natural ability to present and steal strikes, particularly at the bottom of the zone, where his fluid hands and soft glove action consistently worked in his pitchers†favor. He blocked with ease, anticipated well and displayed a calm command of the game that stood out for his age. His throwing mechanics were compact and efficient, producing accurate throws with carry and pop times in the low 1.9s. The arm strength and quick release both played, and his overall defensive polish was ahead of his peers.

While the bat remains a work in progress and may be light long term, Castroâ€s defensive profile gives him a significant carrying tool. With plus upside behind the dish and an advanced understanding of the position, he projected as a high-floor catching prospect capable of anchoring a staff at the next level. He should make it to campus at Western Kentucky this fall.

Wyatt Clatur, RHP, Tennessee

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Virginia

Clatur delivered one of the weekendâ€s most dominant outings, striking out nine over four shutout innings while generating 18 total whiffs—12 on his fastball and six on his slider. The performance underscored both his stuff and competitive demeanor, as he worked quickly, attacked hitters and never appeared fazed by the stage.

An athletic righthander with evident arm speed, Clatur operated from a slightly-crossfire delivery that added deception and angle to his arsenal. His fastball sat 91-93 mph, touched 94 and showed lively finish through the top of the zone. The pitch consistently missed bats, playing up thanks to his tempo and ability to locate it with intent.

His slider, thrown in the low 80s, featured sweep and late movement across the plate. He showed confidence landing it for strikes and used it effectively to finish at-bats against both lefties and righties.

Claturâ€s combination of athleticism, pitchability and competitive edge stood out as much as his raw stuff. With a lively fastball-slider mix, clean arm action and mound presence beyond his years, Clatur looked like a rising name to follow closely moving forward.

Colin Driffill, RHP, Nebraska

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Kansas State

A lean, athletic 6-foot-1, 200-pound righthander, Driffill emerged as one of the more intriguing breakout arms at WWBA. Flashing loud arm strength and an operation built on athleticism, he struck out two across two innings without allowing an earned run.

Driffill sat 92-94 mph and reached 97 twice in his first inning, generating five whiffs on 26 fastballs that showed late life and explosive carry at the top of the zone. His primary secondary was a curveball in the low-to-mid 70s with solid depth. Its shape varied at times, however, hinting at a still-developing feel for spin.

Working from a delivery with some drop-and-drive elements, Driffill showed evident power and arm speed through a deep arm path. His movement patterns were athletic, his lower half strong and his overall projection enticing. With refinement, he had the raw ingredients to make significant strides as he matures.

Driffill entered the event largely under the radar, but that changed quickly. Multiple evaluators told Baseball America he wasnâ€t someone they had heavily followed—or, in some cases, had on their lists at all—before Jupiter. By the time he left, he was firmly among the names who made a strong impression.

Soren Etheridge, RHP, Arizona

• Draft Class: 2027
• College Commitment: Uncommitted

The lone uncommitted prospect on this list, Etheridgeâ€s performance in Jupiter was simply too loud to overlook. The young righthander struck out eight across 3.1 scoreless innings, allowing just one hit and one walk while generating an eye-popping 16 total whiffs, 13 of which came on his fastball.

Etheridgeâ€s heater sat 90-92 mph and touched 94 with late carry, overpowering hitters at the letters. Though his velocity dipped slightly as the outing went on, the pitchâ€s shape and effectiveness held steady throughout. His best secondary was a low-80s changeup with late tumble and fading action—a pitch one evaluator projected could develop into a future plus offering.

Etheridge also mixed a curveball and slider—both in the mid-to-high 70s—that occasionally bled together. He appeared to call for two distinct breaking balls in warmups but threw more of a hybrid shape during game action. A handful of firmer sliders stood out, hinting at the potential to better differentiate a fourth pitch as he matures.

An athletic, projectable arm with a lean frame and multi-sport background—heâ€s also a competitive swimmer—Etheridge showed raw but exciting ingredients. His delivery contained plenty of low-hanging fruit to refine, but with physical growth and mechanical polish, he looked like a highly moldable, high-upside talent whose recruitment should accelerate in short order.

Julian Garcia, RHP, California

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Long Beach State

A physical 6-foot-3, 210-pound righthander, Garcia possessed one of the cleaner arm strokes at the event. He worked from a high three-quarters slot with above-average arm speed and a fastball that sat in the low 90s, touched 93 mph and showed carry through the zone. The pitch got on hitters quickly and played best at the letters. There was some effort when he reached back for more, but it never disrupted his tempo. Further velocity gains appeared well within reach as he continues to mature physically.

Garciaâ€s best offspeed offering was a sharp, high-spin breaking ball in the low-to-mid 70s that eclipsed 2,800 rpm. It came out of his hand clean with pronounced depth and late, biting action when he stayed on top of it. The pitch already induced swings and misses and figures to become a legitimate out pitch with added power. He also mixed a developing changeup that he threw just once in Jupiter.

Over two hitless, scoreless innings with four strikeouts, Garcia displayed two pitches with above-average upside, consistent strike-throwing feel and the type of size and arm speed that suggested more to come.

Will Holden, C, North Carolina

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Wake Forest

A physical 6-foot-3, 205-pound catcher from North Carolina, Holden showed the kind of strength, athleticism and versatility that make him a valuable piece at multiple positions. He moved well for his size and showed the ability to handle both catching and corner infield duties.

Behind the plate, Holden worked from a one-knee setup with decent lower-half quickness and a compact arm action. His throws carried with accuracy, and he showed above-average arm strength. He occasionally struggled with glove-to-hand transfers, but that’s an area that should smooth out with continued reps.

At the plate, Holden hit from a wide stance and generated leverage and loft through the zone. His swing could get steep at times, but the barrel was heavy and produced above-average raw power. Two of his three hits in Jupiter left the yard, and his loose hands and developing approach hinted at more consistency ahead.

Committed to Wake Forest, Holden profiled as a strong, righthanded power bat with defensive versatility and plenty of physical maturity still to come.

Bryant James, SS, Virginia

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Virginia

A lean, wiry 6-foot-1, 175-pound shortstop, James stood out as one of the best athletes in the tournament. His frame offered ample room to add strength, and with natural twitch already present, there was clear upside remaining as he continues to fill out physically.

A double-plus runner with verified 60-yard times in the 6.2-6.3 range, James used his speed as both a weapon and tone-setter. He consistently pressured defenses by getting out of the box quickly to turn routine contact into close plays and extra-base opportunities. His speed was on full display when he coasted in for a triple on a ball to the gap.

At the plate, James hit from a shoulder-high handset with a fairly narrow, upright stance. In lieu of a leg kick, he instead used a controlled stride to get into his swing. His hands worked fast, and his barrel stayed through the hitting zone for a long stretch, giving him a strong contact foundation. Right now, he profiles as a table-setter with gap-to-gap line drive ability, though added strength could unlock more lift and carry in his profile over time.

Defensively, James showed the actions and arm strength to stick at shortstop. His quick first step, lateral range and overall athleticism helped him make plays to both sides. Should he eventually need to move off the position, his elite speed and twitch would translate naturally to the grass.

Taden Krogsgaard, RHP, California

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Cal State Fullerton

A lean and athletic 6-foot-3, 180-pound righthander, Krogsgaard impressed in Jupiter with his projection, polish and feel for spin. Though he also plays third base, his future clearly lies on the mound, where his athleticism and arm speed stand out.

Krogsgaard worked with a low three-quarters release and a bit of crossfire in his delivery, creating natural deception and angle on his pitches. His fastball sat 90-92 mph and touched 93, showing late life through the zone. The heater played up thanks to his ability to locate to both sides, and evaluators noted thereâ€s still velocity left in the tank as his frame continues to fill out.

His best secondary offering was a high-70s sweeper with late horizontal break that he consistently landed for strikes. Several evaluators already viewed the pitch as a fringe-plus weapon that should only improve as he adds strength and velocity.

Across two Jupiter outings, Krogsgaard allowed just one run over six innings, showing advanced pitchability and confidence. With a fastball-slider foundation, physical projection and an athletic delivery, he profiles as a high-upside arm.

Trent Lutz, RHP, Pennsylvania

• Draft Class: 2027
• College Commitment: Penn State

A long-limbed 6-foot-4, 170-pound righthander, Lutz combined present stuff with significant physical projection. His high-waisted, lean frame left plenty of room for added strength, and the delivery already hinted at future power once he grows into it. He worked with a deep, high three-quarters arm stroke and occasionally landed open in his stride, leading to some inconsistency in his release point.

Lutzâ€s fastball sat 90-93 mph and touched 94, showing solid life through the zone. His best velocity and shape came early in the outing, but the pitch still held enough life to miss bats late. He paired it with both a curveball and slider that sometimes bled together. When he stayed on top, the curveball showed depth, but he occasionally got around it and lost finish. He also mixed in a few changeups that flashed promise with late fade.

Still early in his development, Lutzâ€s projection stood out most. His wiry frame, loose arm action and flashes of a true three-pitch mix made him a highly intriguing long-term follow in the 2027 class.

Jace Mataczynski, SS, Wisconsin

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Auburn

One of the most toolsy players in Jupiter, Mataczynski drew a sizable scouting crowd each time he took the field and quickly became one of the weekendâ€s buzziest names. Several evaluators told Baseball America they were zeroing in on the Auburn commit after his standout showing, and his stock appeared to be rising fast.

At 6-foot-3 and 190 pounds, Mataczynski combines promising size, twitch and fluidity. He moved easily at shortstop, showing light feet and impressive body control with an above-average arm that carried across the diamond. His wide, effortless gait translated into plus running ability, allowing him to cover ground both in the field and on the bases.

Offensively, Mataczynski remains raw but dangerous. His two-handed swing occasionally lagged behind better velocity, though his physical strength and bat speed still showed through as he collected six hits, including a home run and two doubles. With added mechanical polish and physical maturity, his offensive game could take a major leap.

Mataczynskiâ€s blend of athleticism, tools and projection has him positioned as a potential early-round follow if his upward trajectory continues.

Lukas McDowell, RHP, Canada

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: North Florida

A towering 6-foot-8, 245-pound righthander and native of Canada, McDowell looked every bit the part of a workhorse starter thanks to his broad shoulders and powerful lower half. His size alone turned heads, but it was the combination of athleticism and stuff that made his outing one of the more memorable performances among the unheralded prospects in Jupiter. Over three scoreless innings, he struck out three without issuing a walk while showing poise and command.

McDowell attacked from a long, whippy low three-quarters slot that created difficult angles and deception. His fastball sat 91-93 mph and touched 95 with carry through the zone and late life that helped it miss five bats. He paired it with a low-80s sweeping slider and a high-70s curveball that featured two-plane depth—both capable of missing barrels when executed. A developing changeup rounded out his four-pitch mix.

At 18, few pitchers combine this kind of physicality, arm speed and athletic operation. McDowellâ€s blend of size and raw stuff gives him a rare ceiling, and continued refinement could make him one of the more fascinating Canadian arms in the 2026 class.

Ethan Offing, OF, South Carolina

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Clemson

An ultra-athletic 6-foot-1, 190-pound center fielder, Offing turned in one of the more complete performances in Jupiter and drew legitimate scouting attention. His combination of speed, defense and emerging impact at the plate made him one of the eventâ€s more intriguing all-around position players.

Offing covered ground easily in center field, showing smooth actions, confident reads and the type of closing speed that allowed him to make more difficult plays look routine. His running ability also translated offensively, where his quickness out of the box and aggressive baserunning kept pressure on defenses.

At the plate, Offingâ€s short, fast swing and advanced bat control stood out. He went 7-for-13 with a double, triple and home run, consistently finding the barrel and flashing surprising strength for his lean frame. The bat speed was real, and his swing path suggested room to grow into more power without sacrificing contact.

With plus speed, reliable defense in center and the potential to both set the table and impact the baseball with authority, Offing looked like a high-upside athlete who would fit perfectly in Clemsonâ€s up-tempo, offensive-minded program if he reaches campus.

Chandler Taylor, OF, Ohio

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Alabama

The younger brother of former Indiana All-American Devin Taylor, Taylor impressed as a lean, athletic 6-foot-3, 185-pound outfielder with real center field potential. He moved with above-average speed, read the ball off the bat well and showed the instincts and reaction time to hold down the middle of the diamond.

At the plate, he shared traits similar to his brother, as his swing stayed on plane and his hands were quick. That ability already allows him to drive the ball all over the field, but as he adds strength, heâ€ll need to learn to lift the ball more consistently to unlock additional power.

Taylorâ€s biggest area for growth is in plate discipline. He needs to sharpen his approach against spin and remain engaged in two-strike counts, rather than expanding too early.

Though still relatively young, Taylor is already committed to Alabama and appears likely to land on campus. His tools, pedigree, and athletic profile make him an interesting name to follow going forward.

Ty Van Valkenburg, RHP, New York

• Draft Class: 2026
• College Commitment: Miami

Built with a strong, durable 6-foot-4, 225-pound frame, Van Valkenburg looked every bit the part of a physical righthander with starter traits. His delivery was compact and repeatable while his arm worked with looseness and whip from a three-quarters release. He occasionally dropped the slot a bit when throwing his slider but maintained a consistent tempo and direction throughout.

Van Valkenburgâ€s fastball sat in the low 90s and reached 94 mph while showing both run and ride that allowed it to miss bats. He commanded the pitch well, especially to his arm side, and collected four whiffs on it in this outing. Over two innings, he punched out four, didnâ€t issue a walk and allowed two hits—one an infield single—without surrendering an earned run.

His primary secondary was an upper-70s slider that flashed above-average potential. The pitch varied in shape, showing tighter, two-plane bite against lefthanded hitters and a sweepier look with more lateral movement to righties. It already profiled as his best swing-and-miss weapon and was responsible for two of his six total whiffs on the day. He also flashed a changeup in warmups but didnâ€t use it in-game.

With physical strength, repeatability and a fastball-slider combination that both played, Van Valkenburg fit the mold of a strike-throwing starter to watch closely this spring.

Source link

Image credit:
Chase DeLauter (Photo by Nick Cammett/Getty Images)

Each year, Baseball America tracks every MLB debut throughout the course of the season. We like to give credit not only to the players whose hard work has paid off, but also to the scouts who identified the talent and helped them sign with their club.

From the Cubs’ Matt Shaw getting his feet wet in Japan against the Dodgers all the way back in March to the Guardians’ Chase DeLauter becoming the latest prospect to make his MLB debut in the playoffs this month, below you can find the full list of players to join the major league ranks in 2025.

Player, PosDebutTeamSigning scout(s)Matt Shaw, 3BMarch 18CubsBilly SwoopeJack Dreyer, LHPMarch 19DodgersMitch SchulewitzRoki Sasaki, RHPMarch 19DodgersN/ADrake Baldwin, CMarch 27BravesJD FrenchKristian Campbell, 2BMarch 27Red SoxKirk FredrikssonRyan Johnson, RHPMarch 27AngelsK.J. HendricksMax Muncy, 2BMarch 27AthleticsDillon TungAlan Roden, LFMarch 27Blue JaysWes PenickHayden Senger, CMarch 27MetsChris HerveyCam Smith, RFMarch 27AstrosIke Ballou (Cubs)Liam Hicks*, CMarch 28MarlinsDustin Smith (Rangers)J.C. Escarra, CMarch 29YankeesKelvin Colon (Orioles)Noah Murdock*, RHPMarch 29AthleticsJim Farr (Royals)Chad Patrick, RHPMarch 29BrewersJeremy Kehrt (D-backs)Connor Thomas*, LHPMarch 29BrewersCharles Peterson (Cardinals)Gage Workman*, 3BMarch 29CubsJoey Lothrop (Tigers)Brad Lord, RHPMarch 30NationalsAlex MoralesJake Mangum, OFMarch 30RaysJet Butler (Mets)Tomoyuki Sugano, RHPMarch 30OriolesN/ALuarbert Arias, RHPMarch 31MarlinsYfrain Linares/Trevor Schumm/Luis Prieto (Padres)Ryan Gusto, RHPMarch 31AstrosCharlie GonzalezGarrett McDaniels*, LHPMarch 31AngelsJonah Rosenthal (Dodgers)Tyler Tolbert, OFMarch 31RoyalsNick HamiltonMike Vasil*, RHPMarch 31White SoxDaniel Coles (Mets)Omar Cruz, LHPApril 1PadresTrevor SchummMason Fluharty, LHPApril 1Blue JaysCoulson BarbicheThomas Harrington, RHPApril 1PiratesMike BradfordChristian Koss, 2BApril 1GiantsJon Lukens (Rockies)Shane Smith*, RHPApril 1White SoxTaylor Frederick (Brewers)Tim Tawa, 2BApril 5D-backsAndrew AllenHunter Dobbins, RHPApril 6Red SoxChris ReillyChase Dollander, RHPApril 6RockiesScott CormanZac Veen, LFApril 8RockiesJohn CedarburgTsung-Che Cheng, SSApril 9PiratesFu-Chan ChiangMichael Darrell-Hicks, RHPApril 11AngelsChris McAlpinChase Meidroth, SSApril 11White SoxJ.J. Altobelli (Red Sox)Logan VanWey, RHPApril 11AstrosJim StevensonCole Henry, RHPApril 13NationalsBrandon LarsonEvan Sisk, LHPApril 15RoyalsCharles PetersonBen Williamson, 3BApril 15MarinersTy HolubBraxton Fulford, CApril 16RockiesJesse RetzlafJustin Hagenman, RHPApril 16MetsJonah Rosenthal (Dodgers)Edgar Quero, CApril 17White SoxBrian Parker (Angels)Matt Svanson, RHPApril 17CardinalsTom Burns (Blue Jays)Caleb Durbin, 3BApril 18BrewersJD French (Braves)Luke Keaschall, 2BApril 18TwinsChandler WagonerJuan Morillo, RHPApril 19D-backsOswaldo Villalobos/Francisco Cartaya/Roman Barinas (Dodgers)Tirso Ornelas, LFApril 19PadresTrevor SchummChandler Simpson, CFApril 19RaysMilt HillBrandon Young, RHPApril 19OriolesDave JenningsPatrick Monteverde, LHPApril 19MarlinsJames ViladeZach Agnos, RHPApril 20RockiesJordan CzarnieckiCade Gibson, LHPApril 20MarlinsBrett BittigerLogan Henderson, RHPApril 20BrewersK.J. HendrickPaxton Schultz, RHPApril 20Blue JaysJeff Scholzen (Brewers)Agustin Ramirez, CApril 21MarlinsJuan Piron (Yankees)Ronny Simon, LFApril 21MarlinsMario Encarnacion/Gian Guzman/Jose Serra (White Sox)Craig Yoho, RHPApril 21BrewersGinger PoulsonSauryn Lao, RHPApril 22MarinersManelik Pimentel/Roman Barinas (Dodgers)Chase Lee, RHPApril 22TigersBrian Morrison (Rangers)Nathan Wiles, RHPApril 22BravesJonathan Hall (Rays)Zak Kent, RHPApril 23GuardiansBrian Matthews (Rangers)Nick Kurtz, 1BApril 23AthleticsNeil AventWill Wilson, 2BApril 23GuardiansChris McAlpin (Angels)Matt Gorski, 1BApril 24PiratesAnthony WycklendtJuan Mejia, RHPApril 24RockiesRolando Fernandez/Martin CabreraRyan Bergert, RHPApril 26PadresDanny SaderJose Fermin, RHPApril 26AngelsJonathan GenaoDoug Nikhazy, LHPApril 26GuardiansCT BradfordGrant Wolfram, LHPApril 26OriolesRoger Coryell (Rangers)Logan Evans, RHPApril 27MarinersJackson LaumannMaverick Handley, CApril 29OriolesScott WalterAJ Blubaugh, RHPApril 30AstrosDrew PearsonTyler Callihan, 2BApril 30RedsSean BuckleyNoah Cameron, LHPApril 30RoyalsMatt PriceChase Petty, RHPApril 30RedsJohn Wilson (Twins)Luis Mey, RHPMay 1RedsFelix RomeroTyler Owens, RHPMay 1TigersJon Bunnell (Braves)Blaine Crim, 1BMay 2RangersBrian MorrisonGunnar Hoglund, RHPMay 2AthleticsDon Norris (Blue Jays)Rhylan Thomas, OFMay 2MarinersRusty McNamara (Mets)Jorbit Vivas, 2BMay 2YankeesLuis Marquez/Roman Barinas/Andres Simancas (Dodgers)Hyeseong Kim, 2BMay 3DodgersMLB contractBlade Tidwell, RHPMay 4MetsNathan BeusterCaleb Freeman, RHPMay 5White SoxRyan DorseyElvis Alvarado, RHPMay 9AthleticsMoises De La Mota (Nationals)Matthew Lugo, CFMay 9AngelsEdgar Perez (Red Sox)Tim Elko, 1BMay 10White SoxWarren HughesCade Horton, RHPMay 10CubsTy NicholsBraydon Fisher, RHPMay 11Blue JaysClint Bowers (Dodgers)Moises Ballesteros, CMay 13CubsLouie Eljaua/Julio Figueroa/Hector OrtegaRyan Rolison, LHPMay 13RockiesZack ZulliColton Gordon, LHPMay 14AstrosCharlie GonzalezDalton Rushing, CMay 15DodgersMarty LambRyan Fitzgerald, 2BMay 16TwinsN/A (Red Sox)Carson Palmquist, LHPMay 16RockiesRafael ReyesMick Abel, RHPMay 18PhilliesZach FriedmanCarson McCusker, RFMay 18TwinsN/AKade Strowd, RHPMay 18OriolesAdrian DorseyCarlos Duran, RHPMay 22AthleticsManelik Pimentel (Dodgers)Robert Hassell III, CFMay 22NationalsTyler Stubblefield (Padres)Denzel Clarke, CFMay 23AthleticsDillon TungDaylen Lile, RFMay 23NationalsBrian ClearyLogan Davidson, 1BMay 24AthleticsWilliam AventMarcelo Mayer, SSMay 24Red SoxJJ AltobelliNic Enright, RHPMay 25GuardiansPete LoizzoWillie MacIver, CMay 25AthleticsMatt Pignataro (Rockies)Alejandro Osuna, LFMay 25RangersEfrain LaraBraxton Ashcraft, RHPMay 26PiratesPhil HuttmanVíctor Mesa Jr., CFMay 26MarlinsFernando SeguignolDavid Morgan, RHPMay 26PadresJustin BaughmanJohn Rave, OFMay 26RoyalsScott MelvinDrew Avans, OFMay 27AthleticsBenny Latino (Dodgers)Yaramil Hiraldo, RHPMay 27OriolesCesar Geronimo/Luis Baez (D-backs)Blas Castano, RHPMay 28MarinersEdgar Mateo/Victor Mata/Raul Gonzalez (Yankees)Heriberto Hernandez, LFMay 30MarlinsWilly Espinal (Rangers)Andrew Hoffmann, RHPMay 30RoyalsTerry Tripp (Braves)Bradgley Rodriguez, RHPMay 31PadresLuis PrietoJack Winkler, SSMay 31MarlinsTroy Stewart (Athletics)Cole Young, 2BMay 31MarinersJackson LaumannJacob Melton, OFJun 1AstrosTim CosticDylan Smith, RHPJun 2TigersMike SmithJac Caglianone, RFJun 3RoyalsNick PrestoAlan Rangel, RHPJun 6PhilliesManuel Sameniego (Braves)Ryan Ritter, SSJun 6RockiesScott CormanKyle Teel, CJun 6White SoxWallace Rios (Red Sox)Otto Kemp, 3BJun 7PhilliesZach FriedmanChristian Montes De Oca, RHPJun 7D-backsCesar Geronimo/Omar RogersKyle Backhus, LHPJun 8D-backsMike MeyersRoman Anthony, RFJun 9Red SoxWillie RomayIan Seymour, LHPJun 9RaysLandon LassiterGrant Taylor, RHPJun 10White SoxWarren HughesAndre Granillo, RHPJun 12CardinalsChris RodriguezJacob Misiorowski, RHPJun 12BrewersRiley BandelowChristian Moore, 2BJun 13AngelsJoel MurrieWill Robertson, OFJun 15Blue JaysWes PenickBrady House, 3BJun 16NationalsEric RobinsonJack Little, RHPJun 19DodgersTom KunisDidier Fuentes, RHPJun 20BravesOrlando CovoWikelman Gonzalez, RHPJun 20White SoxWilder Lobo/Rollie Pino (Red Sox)Robinson Piña, RHPJun 20MarlinsFrancisco Tejeda (Angels)Paul Gervase, RHPJun 21RaysJet Butler (Mets)Jake Palisch, LHPJun 21White SoxTyler WiltJosh Simpson, LHPJun 21MarlinsBlake NewsomeJack Perkins, RHPJun 22AthleticsRich SparksChase Burns, RHPJun 24RedsEddie LehrJonathan Pintaro, RHPJun 25MetsJaymie BaneJoe Rock, LHPJun 28RaysEd Santa (Rockies)Carson Seymour, RHPJun 29GiantsScott Thomas (Mets)Colby Thomas, RFJun 30AthleticsJemel SpearmanJuan Burgos, RHPJul 1MarinersFrancisco RosarioYanquiel Fernandez, RFJul 2RockiesRonaldo Fernandez/Marc Russo/Raul GomezAndry Lara, RHPJul 2NationalsRonald MorilloEduarniel Nuñez, RHPJul 2PadresMariano Encarnacion/Gian Guzman/Jose SerraAnthony Seigler, 3BJul 2BrewersDarryl Monroe (Yankees)Chad Stevens, 2BJul 3AngelsTim Costic (Astros)Colson Montgomery, SSJul 4White SoxJustin WechslerTravis Adams, RHPJul 5TwinsMichael QuesadaLazaro Estrada, RHPJul 5Blue JaysHarry Einbinder/Sandy RosarioJayvien Sandridge, LHPJul 5YankeesNathan Showalter/Hendrik HerzShinnosuke Ogasawara, LHPJul 6NationalsN/AKenedy Corona, CFJul 7AstrosWilson Peralta (Mets)Alex Carrillo, RHPJul 8MetsRick Schroeder (Rangers)Tristin English, 1BJul 9D-backsHudson BelinskyCam Schlittler, RHPJul 9YankeesMatt HydeBrice Matthews, 2BJul 11AstrosDrew PearsonCody Freeman, 3BJul 18RangersSteve FloresBrandyn Garcia, LHPJul 21MarinersDerek MillerCarlos Cortes, RFJul 23AthleticsDaniel Coles (Mets)Troy Melton, RHPJul 23TigersSteve PackWarming Bernabel, 1BJul 26RockiesRonaldo Fernandez/Martin CabreraCarson Whisenhunt, LHPJul 28GiantsDJ JaussTroy Johnston, 1BJul 29MarlinsScott FairbanksPierson Ohl, RHPJul 29TwinsAndrew AyersAlex Freeland, 3BJul 30DodgersWes SargentLuis Curvelo, RHPJul 31RangersDavid Brito (Mariners)Dugan Darnell, RHPAug 1RockiesN/AJeremiah Jackson, RFAug 1OriolesJ.T. Zink (Angels)Jakob Marsee, CFAug 1MarlinsMatt Maloney (Padres)Luis Morales, RHPAug 1AthleticsJavier AgelvisC.J. Kayfus, 1BAug 2GuardiansGustavo BenzanPJ Poulin, LHPAug 5NationalsMike Garlatti (Rockies)Cam Sanders, RHPAug 5PiratesTrey Forkerway (Cubs)Justin Dean, OFAug 8DodgersBilly Best (Braves)Drew Gilbert, OFAug 8GiantsFreddy Perez (Astros)Kyle Karros, 3BAug 8RockiesMatt HattabaughTristan Peters, OFAug 8RaysPete Vuckovich Jr. (Brewers)Luinder Avila, RHPAug 13RoyalsJose Figueroa/Joelvis GonzalezOwen Caissie, RFAug 14CubsChris Kemlo (Padres)Bob Seymour, 1BAug 15RaysJoe HastingsNolan McLeanAug 16MetsScott ThomasDylan BeaversAug 16OriolesScott WalterNathan ChurchAug 17CardinalsChris RodriguezSamuel BasalloAug 17OriolesMichael Cruz/Gerardo CabreraMaximo AcostaAug 18MarlinsRafic Saab/Jhonny Gomez (Rangers)Nolan HoffmanAug 18PhilliesAustin Wates (Mariners)Parker MessickAug 20GuardiansMatt LinderJoel PegueroAug 21GiantsDaniel Santana (Rays)Bubba ChandlerAug 22PiratesCam MurphyCarson WilliamsAug 22RaysJaime JonesJhostynxon GarciaAug 22Red SoxRollie Pino/Eddie RomeroDrew SommersAug 22TigersBrian Oliver (Rays)Zach MaxwellAug 23RedsJerel JohnsonWill BanfieldAug 23RedsChristian Castorri (Marlins)John RooneyAug 24AstrosPaul Murphy (Dodgers)Brian Van BelleAug 24RaysWillie Romay (Red Sox)McCade BrownAug 24RockiesScott CormanTaylor RashiAug 28D-backsBrad Cameron (Giants)César PrietoAug 29CardinalsKoby Perez (Orioles)Jimmy CrooksAug 29CardinalsPete PariseJonah TongAug 29MetsMarlin McPhailPayton TolleAug 29Red SoxChris ReillyMason BarnettAug 30AthleticsWill Howard (Royals)Cam DevanneyAug 31PiratesTaylor Frederick (Brewers)George ValeraSep 1GuardiansJhonathan Leyba/Domingo ToribioCJ StubbsSep 1NationalsTim Costic (Astros)Andrew AlvarezSep 1NationalsBryan ByrneSal StewartSep 1RedsAndrew FabianMitch FarrisSep 2AngelsBilly Best (Braves)Rolddy MuñozSep 2BravesCarlos SequeraHayden HarrisSep 2BravesAlan Butts (Braves)Carter JensenSep 2RoyalsMatt PriceJayden MurraySep 4AstrosDavid Hamlett (Rays)Harry FordSep 5MarinersJohn WiedenbauerChristian RoaSep 6MarlinsMike Partida (Reds)Brandon SproatSep 7MetsBrett CampbellNick RaquetSep 8CardinalsBobby Myrick (Nationals)Connelly EarlySep 9Red SoxWallace RiosZach ColeSep 12AstrosScott OberhelmanCody LawerysonSep 13TwinsJohn WilsonDenzer GuzmanSep 13AngelsDomingo GarciaCarson RagsdaleSep 14OriolesBryce Harman (Phillies)Trey YesavageSep 15Blue JaysCoulson BarbicheBryce EldridgeSep 15GiantsJohn DiCarloDom HamelSep 17MetsGary BrownRafael FloresSep 17PiratesDave Keith (Yankees)Cole WilcoxSep 19RaysTyler Stubblefield (Padres)Philip AbnerSep 19D-backsMatt MercurioPetey HalpinSep 20GuardiansCarlos MunizHunter BarcoSep 23PiratesCam MurphyAustin PopeSep 25D-backsDennis SheehanJose CorniellSep 28RangersFranciso Rosario (Mariners)Chase DeLauterOct 1GuardiansKyle Bamberger

Source link

With a week to go before NHL teams have to submit their opening night rosters ahead of the 2025-26 season, several rookies around the league are having steady training camps and making their teams think about what to do with them from here.

Teams who find themselves tight against the salary cap might prioritize having a youngster on the roster to grow their game and financially fit the structure of the group. Other teams may have a veteran who is being marginally outplayed by a prospect, but choose to hang on to the older player because they’d otherwise have to expose them to waivers.

The final week of NHL training camps is going to lay bare team strategies and open opportunities for rookies and veterans alike.

Hereâ€s a look at some of the prospects Iâ€m tracking closely before next Mondayâ€s NHL roster announcements:

Parekh is a unicorn prospect for the Calgary Flames, a transitional defenceman who can almost be described as a rover. Heâ€s equal parts fourth forward as he is offensive defenceman. Parekh produced 97G-172A in 206 combined regular season and playoff games with the Saginaw Spirit (OHL) before making his Flames debut last spring. He was also an impressive plus-84 with the Spirit.

Iâ€ve liked a lot of Parekhâ€s game at Flames training camp. Heâ€s playing to his identity with his offensive approach, while learning what itâ€s going to take to defend at the NHL level. It will take some time, and there will be growing pains, but Calgary doesnâ€t have a defenceman like Parekh on their roster. He looks like he can quarterback one of their power play units and heâ€s been active off the puck joining the rush as an extra layer.

Here are some examples of what Iâ€ve noticed from Parekh in the pre-season.

The first clip demonstrates Parekhâ€s vision, agility, and quick release getting pucks to the net. His ability to find open space to create offence is elite. Heâ€s in motion looking for the best possible shooting or passing angle and covers a wide area of the offensive zone in the process, making him hard to front and defend.

Opposing teams will need to be aware of Parekhâ€s ability to join the rush as an extra attacker. When he identifies an opportunity to explode up ice off the puck, heâ€s aggressive trying to create odd-man rushes for his group.

Now on to the growing pains portion of Parekhâ€s game that will need to evolve as he gains more traction at the pro level.

In the following clip Parekh and his partner, Kevin Bahl, are in relatively good shape defending the neutral zone, but once the play enters Parekhâ€s side of the ice he gives up far too much gap. Parekh does well to block the initial shot but then breaks down in his recovery. He initially chases the play to the corner where Jonathan Huberdeau has engaged his check, then ends up late to the crease as Seattle capitalizes on the small area breakdown.

I see a path for Parekh to break camp with the Flames, but I also envision him skating in sheltered minutes at even strength in Calgaryâ€s bottom pairing. His element offensively should land him a role on one of Calgaryâ€s power play units.

Schaefer is one of my favourite prospects and the most endearing young person I have scouted in my career. Heâ€s going to have a long career in the NHL as a top pairing defenceman who is deployed in all situations.

Schaefer made headlines last week with his superior effort against the Philadelphia Flyers when he tracked down Matvei Michkov in overtime to kill a breakaway scoring opportunity and turned up ice to rip a puck from a high danger area. His 200-foot effort is infectious and speaks to his overall competitiveness.

The NHL is a hard league and the games get more difficult as training camp goes on. Schaefer continues to evolve. Heâ€s being deployed in all situations for the Islanders, but heâ€s learning some things along the way.

An example is the following clip of a goal against versus New Jersey. Schaefer doesnâ€t fully engage on the Islanders’ blue line. He will look back at this play and recognize he needed more urgency to kill it before it became a scoring chance, and ultimately a goal against:

I want to end Schaeferâ€s breakdown on a positive. Hereâ€s an example of what sets certain players apart early in their NHL development. In the following sequence Schaefer keeps the puck in on the offensive blue line and, with his head up, directs a “shot/pass†to Anthony Duclair. Duclair corrals the disc and deposits it in the Devils’ net.

Schaeferâ€s hockey sense and vision are elite. He will make difficult puck plays look more simple than they actually are.

Schaefer is going to be an NHL defenceman this season. He will break camp with the Islanders, but he might start the season skating in the bottom pairing at even strength alongside a veteran like Scott Mayfield. Mayfieldâ€s style is different than Schaeferâ€s and should allow the youngster to take some risks knowing Mayfield has his back in the defensive zone when things occasionally break down.

Ike Howard, W, Edmonton Oilers

I would describe Howardâ€s training camp as “mixed results†thus far in Edmonton. Heâ€s played with solid pace up ice, tracking opponents as F1 on the forecheck, and using his speed to disrupt puck plays and create some turnovers. Heâ€s also deposited the puck in the back of the net working the weak side flank on the power play. But there have been some instances where Howard has been caught puck watching or not moving his feet in the defensive zone that have led to scoring chances and goals against.

Here’s an example of what the Oilers can expect from Howard on the power play. In the sequence he actually breaks his stick on his first shot attempt, only to return to the scene with a new twig and different approach to directing the puck on goal. His quick release snap shot ends up in the back of the Winnipeg Jets net:

The puck moves quickly in the NHL and players have to be “on time†defensively so they can help keep plays out of high danger areas and the back of their net. In the following clip Howard gets caught anticipating the puck will be exiting his zone. When it doesnâ€t, he struggles to take the proper route and engage along the half-wall to win back the puck. Itâ€s a hectic sequence that exposes Howard chasing the play in his zone before the Jets end up scoring.

I appreciate the speed Howard provides tracking up and down the ice, especially off the rush offensively, and he has the kind of release that can beat NHL goalies clean from a variety of spots in the offensive zone. Ultimately his ‘B’ game will have to evolve in order for Howard to stick in the NHL this season, but I believe he has the hockey sense and competitiveness to adjust and pay close attention to his defensive responsibilities when heâ€s not scoring.

The Ducks are a team on the rise and Sennecke is a hulking (6-foot-3, 206 pounds) skill forward who will eventually play a big role for them as they trend towards being a playoff team and potential contender in the coming years. He produced 36G-50A in the regular season with the Oshawa Generals last year and followed it up with 14G-18A in 18 playoff games. His combination of length, power and puck touch make him very difficult to defend.

Sennecke has caught my eye at training camp with a couple of plays that speak exactly to his identity as a player.

In the first clip he regroups in the neutral zone before powering to the net for a tuck.

Not every play will result in a goal or an assist, but can still be classified as unique and perhaps elite. Hereâ€s an example of Sennecke creating a scoring chance following an inaccurate pass that was in his feet. He barely breaks stride corralling the puck and motioning it on to his stick off his back foot. It speaks to his coordination and sneaky ability to make something out of nothing.

The Ducks have a big decision to make with Sennecke. They might keep him around for a nine-game NHL audition this fall to see if he can earn a full year in the league. Otherwise, Anaheim will be forced to send Sennecke back to Oshawa for one more year since the new rule regarding clubs being allowed to place one 19-year-old prospect in the AHL instead of junior doesnâ€t kick in until next season.

Source link

Image credit: (Photo by Matthew Grimes Jr./Atlanta Braves/Getty Images) In this week’s Future Projection, Bed Badler and Carlos Collazo talk…

By the end of this week, rookies will report and participate in pre-season tournaments, and by late next week NHL…