Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
- MJF-Bandido was a template for MJF going forward, the great Mercedes promo most fans didn’t see
- Virat Kohli dethrones Rohit Sharma, becomes No. 1 batter in ODI Rankings for the first time since 2021
- How to watch Chelsea vs Arsenal: Live streams, TV details
- India vs New Zealand 2nd ODI 2025: India announces their Playing 11, as Team New Zealand Wins the Toss and Elects to Bowl First Against India
- A Hollywood ending? Inside the final days of LeBron James in Los Angeles
- Everton: How Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall is thriving after Chelsea exit
- WWE Planning Big Event For Italy In 2026
- Scottish gossip: Doig, Raskin, Gassama, Neilson, Ageu, Glasgow, Jikiemi
Browsing: Rules
“The Fifa president does not have the authority to unilaterally dictate the organisation’s mission, strategic direction, policies and values.”
BBC Sport has contacted football’s world governing body for comment.
Infantino and Trump stood side by side during the glittering ceremony at the Kennedy Center for next year’s tournament, which takes place in the US, Canada and Mexico from 11 June-19 July.
As well as a large golden trophy, Trump received a medal and certificate from Infantino, who said “this is what we want from a leader” and “you can always count, Mr President, on my support” during a speech that followed a video before the presentation.
In October, the 55-year-old posted on Instagram saying Trump “definitely deserves” the Nobel Peace Prize.
During an interview in November at the American Business Forum in Miami, Infantino also added: “We should all support what [Trump] is doing [in the US] because I think it’s looking pretty good.”
FairSquare also alleged a video post by Infantino on Instagram in January – following his invite to Trump’s inauguration – “indicates support for President Trump’s political agenda”.
Nicholas McGeehan, FairSquare’s programme director, added: “This complaint is about a lot more than Infantino’s support for President Donald Trump’s political agenda.
“More broadly this is about how Fifa’s absurd governance structure has allowed Gianni Infantino to openly flout the organisation’s rules and act in ways that are both dangerous and directly contrary to the interests of the world’s most popular sport.”
The Rules of Golf are tricky! Thankfully, we’ve got the guru. Our Rules Guy knows the book front to back. Got a question? He’s got all the answers.
Do any rules govern playing music on the course? It seems to me it shouldn’t be allowed, with its potential to distract or assist players. Do I have a case? —Paul Dehner Sr., via email
With apologies to the late Robert Palmer, we have a bad case of loving this question. And, as always, Dr. Doctor is here to give you the news: You might have a case. Playing music specifically to eliminate distractions or help with tempo breaches Rule 4.3a(4).
That said, playing music in and of itself is not a breach but nonetheless should be done with consideration for others.
For more guidance from our guru, read on …

Rules Guy: My distracted match-play partner accidentally picked up my ball. What now?
By:
Rules Guy
My buddy and I were playing an early-morning round. We each wore a pullover to combat the chill. On the 7th hole, he took off his pullover and, because his bag was across the green, draped it atop the flagstick as he putted with the pin in. Neither of us knew if this was permitted. —Bruce Reeder, Seattle
Rules Guy’s beloved aunt, Style Lady, informs us that it is permissible should the pullover’s color not clash with the flag’s.
From a Rules perspective, the only potential penalty we can think of would be intent-based — say, your buddy deliberately did so to move the flagstick to a position other than centered or to cast a shadow to aim at.
Failing a desire to assist his play, there wouldn’t be a problem with treating the flagstick as a clothes hanger, although it feels a tad presumptuous.
Want to find the right gear for your bag in 2025?Find a club-fitting location near you at True Spec Golf.
Got a question about the Rules? Ask the Rules Guy! Send your queries, confusions and comments to rulesguy@golf.com. We promise he won’t throw the book at you.
The Rules of Golf are tricky! Thankfully, we’ve got the guru. Our Rules Guy knows the book front to back. Got a question? He’s got all the answers.
My playing partner stubbed his chip shot from the deep rough around the collar of the green. The ball was rolling slowly toward the pin. In a fit of pique, he banged his club into the collar, dislodging a large piece of turf which flew onto the green and hit the rolling ball, stopping it in its tracks. It would probably have rolled only another foot otherwise. Still, is it a penalty? —Cornelius Marx, New York, New York
It certainly feels like it should be, more for the damage to the course than the eventual deflected stroke.
Nonetheless, unless the Committee sees creating this damage as serious misconduct under Rule 1.2a (which would mean disqualification), the accidental deflection stands without penalty, and Mr. Angry Stubby plays the ball as it lies, under Rule 11.1.
As an aside, Cornelius, Rules Guy very much appreciated “in a fit of pique,” and should we ever take a much-needed vacation will reach out to you to ghostwrite this column in our absence.

Rules Guy: My ball fell off the tee mid-swing. Do I have to take a penalty for hitting a ball in motion?
By:
Rules Guy
For more guidance from our guru, read on …
During a practice round, the ball moved while I was at the top of my backswing. I continued my swing and executed the intended punch shot, but in a tournament round would that be a penalty and, if so, what? —Preston Scott, Tallahassee, Fla.
First, the good news: When the ball moves after the backswing has begun and the stroke is completed, there is no penalty for playing a moving ball and you play the ball from wherever the stroke comes to rest. Thank Rule 9.1b for that.
The potential bad news/caveat: If it were your actions that caused the ball to move, you’re still potentially on the hook for one penalty stroke under Rule 9.4b.
Want to find the right gear for your bag in 2025?Find a club-fitting location near you at True Spec Golf.
Got a question about the Rules? Ask the Rules Guy! Send your queries, confusions and comments to rulesguy@golf.com. We promise he won’t throw the book at you.
The countdown to next summer’s World Cup is well and truly on.
It is now just over six months until the tournament, which will be co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, kicks off at Estadio Azteca in Mexico City on Thursday, June 11, 2026.
With 42 of the 48 competing countries confirmed – the final six will be decided in the play-offs next March – attention turns to the World Cup 2026 draw, where teams will find out their group-stage opponents.
You may like
When is the World Cup 2026 draw and how does it work?

Estadio Azteca will host the opening game of the World Cup (Image credit: Getty)
Next year’s edition of the tournament will be the biggest World Cup to date, with the number of teams ballooning from 32 to 48.
It means there will be a record 104 matches, taking place at 16 stadiums across North America, with 72 games in the expanded group stage alone.

Argentina are the World Cup holders after lifting the trophy in 2022 (Image credit: Marvin Ibo Guengoer – GES Sportfoto/Getty Images)
The draw will take place this Friday, December 5, at the Kennedy Centre in Washington DC, starting at 5pm UK time. It will be broadcast live on BBC Two and streamed on the FIFA YouTube channel.
FIFA president Gianni Infantino will oversee proceedings, although it is unlikely the draw itself will start bang on 5pm, with previous ceremonies involving various speeches, special guests and more before the main event.
The best features, fun and footballing quizzes, straight to your inbox every week.
The 48 teams have been divided into four pots of 12 countries, with the 12 groups formed by drawing one country from each pot.
Pot one features the United States, Mexico and Canada, plus the nine highest-placed teams in the FIFA rankings, while the six spots assigned to the play-off winners are all in pot four – which means the final team in six of the 12 groups will not be confirmed until next March.
No more than two European teams can be drawn in the same group, while it is only one per group for each of the other confederations.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino will oversee proceedings (Image credit: PA)
Mexico, Canada and the United States have already been assigned to groups A, B and D respectively, while FIFA have also announced that the top four teams in the rankings – European champions Spain, World Cup holders Argentina, France and England – will each be in different ‘pathways’ to the semi-finals, meaning that if they all win their groups they cannot meet until the last four.
The match schedule will be announced the day after the draw, on Saturday, December 6, giving FIFA the chance to work out which kick-off times and venues suit fans in North America and around the world.
The group stage runs from June 11 to June 27, with the last 32 starting the following day. The final will be held at the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on Sunday, July 19.
This week, golf champions from around the world will compete in a three-team, stroke-play competition at the 2025 World Champions Cup. Team USA, Team Europe and Team International will vie for bragging rights after last year’s event was postponed because of the impact of Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton on the Florida coast. The inaugural World Champions Cup took place in 2023 at The Concession Golf Club in Bradenton, Florida.
Check out key facts about the 2025 World Champions Cup below:
How can I watch?
*All times Eastern
Thursday, Dec. 4
Friday, Dec. 5
Sunday, Dec. 7
Who is playing?
Team USA
Team Europe
Team International
What is the format?
Team USA, Team Europe and Team International will compete in singles play, Scottish Sixsome and Six Ball to determine the ultimate winning team.
How does scoring work?
Three points will be awarded every hole, with the team scoring the lowest receiving two points and the team scoring the second lowest receiving one. Teams that score the same on a hole receive the same points.
What is the purse?
Champions will win $100,000 per person, with second place winning $75,000 and third place winning $50,000.
Check out the ESPN golf hub page for scores, stats, schedules, rankings and more.
Premier League clubs voted on Friday to overhaul the division’s financial regulations from the start of next season — but rejected controversial plans to introduce “anchoring.”
The league’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) will be scrapped in favour of Squad-Cost Rules (SCR), which limit clubs to spending no more than 85% of their football revenue and net profit or loss from transfers.
The Premier League confirmed in a statement that “a multi-year allowance of an extra 30% will incur a levy and once the allowance is exhausted, they will need to comply with 85 per cent or face a sporting sanction.”
Editor’s Picks
The move to SCR brings the Premier League more into line with UEFA, which currently dictates that clubs participating in its competitions must spend no more than 70% of revenue on football costs.
Clubs have also approved new Sustainability and Systematic Resilience (SSR) proposals which the Premier League described as “assessing a club’s short, medium and long-term financial health through three tests — Working Capital Test, Liquidity Test and Positive Equity Test.”
A source has told ESPN that the SSR vote passed unanimously but there were just seven clubs who supported ‘top-to-bottom anchoring’ (TBA), a proposal which would have limited any club from spending more than five times the money earned in the previous season by the league’s bottom club from centralised payments — prize money, television fees and collective commercial income.
Premier League clubs have voted in new squad cost ratio rules. Getty
“The new SCR rules are intended to promote opportunity for all clubs to aspire to greater success and brings the League’s financial system close to UEFA’s existing SCR rules which operate at a threshold of 70 per cent,” the Premier League said in a statement.
“The other key features of the League’s new system include transparent in-season monitoring and sanctions, protection against sporting underperformance, an ability to spend ahead of revenues, strengthened ability to invest off the pitch, and a reduction in complexity by focusing on football costs.”
– Chelsea’s Cole Palmer out vs. Burnley after freak injury at home
– Pep Guardiola sends bullish title warning to Arsenal, Liverpool
– Diogo Jota tragedy no excuse for Liverpool form – Arne Slot
The votes conclude two years of consultations which included trialling both SCR and TBA over last season and the current one in the form of shadow monitoring to help clubs understand how to comply were the changes brought in. SCR replaces PSR, which limited clubs to a maximum loss of £105 million ($137.2m) over a rolling three-year period.
The decision to reject anchoring will draw particular attention given its supporters believed the move would improve the competitive balance of the league. However, the Professional Footballers Association has argued that any cap on spending could affect players’ wages, while sources say concerns were raised that top English clubs would not be able to compete in the transfer market for the world’s best players if a hard spending cap was introduced.
Three of the sport’s biggest agencies — CAA Stellar, CAA Base and Wasserman — had threatened potential legal action by suggesting the introduction of TBA would be in contravention of section two of the UK’s Competition Act. Linking the limit to revenue rather than a fixed number based on centralised contracts gives clubs more flexibility.

Disqualifications are common in the upper rungs of professional golf. The causes range from sloppy accounting on scorecards to players unwittingly gaming non-conforming equipment, but rarely are pros shown the door for flat-out cheating.
That’s what makes the case of 25-year-old Swiss pro Cedric Gugler so remarkable.
In June, Gugler, who plays on the HotelPlanner Tour — the feeder circuit for the DP World Tour — was DQ’ed after the first round of an event in the Czech Republic for “playing his ball from the wrong place on putting surfaces on multiple occasions,” according to a statement issued by the European Tour Group this week.
At the time, the disqualification passed without much fanfare, presumably because the cause of the DQ was not publicized. That changed Friday when the Tour announced that an Independent Disciplinary Panel had convened on Nov. 3 to assess Gugler’s actions and ruled that he had “conducted himself in a manner that fell below the standards of behaviour and ethical conduct expected of Tour members.”
The panel determined that the manner in which Gugler illegally marked his balls en route to his opening 75 at the Raiffeisenbank Golf Challenge was a “reckless infringement of the Rules of Golf.”
Gugler will pay a steep price for his transgression. The panel has suspended him for the first 10 HotelPlanner Tour events of the 2026 season, beginning with the SDC Open in South Africa on Jan. 29. More costly still will be the damage this ruling will inflict on Gugler’s reputation.
Gugler made 18 starts on the HotelPlanner Tour in 2025 and finished 166th in the tour’s season-long points race. In the lead-up to the Czech Republic event, he had missed seven cuts in 10 starts and banked less than $4,000 in earnings.
Gugler has played sparingly on the DP World Tour, but he did finish 4th as a sponsor invite at the 2024 Omega European Masters in his homeland, which he called “the highlight of my career.”
“I love playing in front of big crowds on the big stage and it makes me stronger as a golfer,” Gugler said. “It was so special to play on the DP World Tour and that’s where I feel I belong in the future. My aim is to get there as quick as possible.”
Here’s is the European Tour Group’s statement in full:
The European Tour Group announced today that Cedric Gugler has been sanctioned for breaching its Code of Behaviour in a tournament on the HotelPlanner Tour.
An Independent Disciplinary Panel, which met on November 3, 2025, found that Gugler had conducted himself in a manner that fell below the standards of behaviour and ethical conduct expected of Tour members during the first round of the Raiffeisenbank Golf Challenge at the Kaskada Golf Resort in the Czech Republic on June 12, 2025.
He was disqualified from the tournament after playing his ball from the wrong place on putting surfaces on multiple occasions.
The Independent Disciplinary Panel – comprising Philip Evans KC, sports administrator Ian Larsen and Legends Tour Member Markus Brier – ruled that Gugler’s conduct was a serious breach of the Tour’s Code of Behaviour by virtue of a reckless infringement of the Rules of Golf.
Because of the serious breach, he has been suspended for the first 10 HotelPlanner Tour events of the season, beginning on January 29, 2026, the day of the Tour’s first tournament of the 2026 season, the SDC Open in South Africa.
He will be permitted to return after the first ten events have concluded, a date which will be determined once the 2026 HotelPlanner Tour schedule has been finalised and announced.
November 17, 2025 | Eamonn Hall
The Team Handicap Cup in the Burnham & District Table Tennis Winter League has been dominated over recent years by the methodical and talented Cold Norton B team. With new rules and structure in place for this season would this command be threatened in any way? It would appear not.
Despite rule changes to provide the lesser handicapped teams with some extra points on the board, hot favourites Cold Norton B stormed to a traditional whitewash victory over the hapless Blackwater B trio in their Round of 16 knockout match. “5-0 to the Norton Boys†was the cry from the expectant crowd as the Cold Norton trio of Ian Wall (-18), Sam Lowman (-18), and Captain Dan Anderson (-12) went about their business.
Ian Wall & Sam Lowman in action
Despite the overall scoreline the games were all very close and the Blackwater trio of Louis Gunn (-2), Pete Mortensen (-2), and Roger Slade (-1) certainly made the hotshots work for their victory. Both doubles went to long deciding sets, with the opening match setting the tone for the evening with Lowman and Anderson coming though 26-24 in the decider against Gunn & Slade.
The singles were all won in straight sets but each leg saw the Blackwater team with over 15 points on the board with Cold Norton just having the focus and talent edge come the business end.
Last yearâ€s runners-up Blackwater A also progressed to the quarter-final stage courtesy of a 5-2 win over St Lawrence A with Neil Freeman (-6) in a starring role remaining unbeaten across his three matches. All the singles were won in straight sets with the only St Lawrence point coming from Nigel Brand (+12) against Alan Scammell (-3).
Division 3â€s Blackwater F grabbed the headlines with an unexpected 6-3 triumph against top Division 1 team Cold Norton A. Unfortunately, Cold Norton were short a player so Blackwater had a 4-0 start but still had to get past Duncan Taylor (-20), and Steve Maltby (-9).
Both David McHattie (+9) and Anne Brewer (+11) were able to use their head starts to great effect against Maltby for their actual wins, but none of the Blackwater team could muster the patience to outsmart Taylor. McHattie at least took a leg and forced Taylor into an energy sapping deciding leg but it was not to be.
Blackwater C are the most in-form team across the league and look to be a dangerous Handicap team. In a very closely matched encounter with Woodham D the Blackwater team somehow found themselves 4-2 down with just three matches to play as Jean Chasmer (+6) had dominated for Woodham with three wins already.
With four of the first six matches going to a deciding set the Blackwater team also had the clock against them – so a quick huddle, a change of tactics, and out they came firing on all cylinders as Peter Davenport (+1) ended the Chasmer unbeaten run, and then Gary Smith (0) outfoxed Chris Crooks (+2), and the final winner takes all doubles saw Smith and Andrea Alleyne (+3) outhit Chasmer and Simon Thomas (+4) just as the closing bell was clanging! Blackwater C are definitely a team to watch in this competition.
Woodham B often do well in the cup and their campaign this season got off to a good start with a hard-fought 5-1 victory over Cold Norton D. The sole cold Norton victory saw Terry Hyland (-3) keep his nerve against the hard-hitting Sanjay Saptarshi (-14) for a three-set victory that went to 24-22 in the decider. There were two further three-setters but Woodhamâ€s other players Graham Briggs (-6) and Peter Harverson (-6) kept their nerves to come through unbeaten all evening.
In a long evening at Maldon the Cold Norton E trio took eight matches to finally get the better of a stubborn Maldon C side. No player remained unbeaten but Cold Nortonâ€s Tony Forster (-6) was very effective winning three of his four matches including the important final match against Dawn Baldry (-7).
Another talented handicap team from Cold Norton showed their mettle as they triumphed in both three setters where Forster bested Chris Ravenhill (0), and Oscar Wyman (+4) came out on top against Brian Riedling (-2).
Cold Norton C completed the triple threat from the Cold Norton Club in the quarters as they overcame the strong resistance from Blackwater E to post a 5-2 victory. Neil Want (-11) did the most damage for the Cold Norton crew as he won all three of his matches as he overcame the handicaps of both Deb Ginn (+5) and Kath Little (+9) – who knew he had so much patience?
Wantâ€s display was very much needed as the Blackwater team took an early 2-1 lead winning the opening doubles and then Phil ‘Wild†West (+8) posted a very long and hard fought three-set win over Arron Chandler (-14). But that was it and the Cold Norton trio were not found Wanting in the remaining games as they heartlessly rattled off four wins on the bounce for a place in the next round.
In the final match of the round of 16, Mapledene hosted Woodham D and they got off to a flying start winning the opening three matches. As the early bath beckoned Woodham pulled the plug with Alan Dadswell (-2) overcoming the Bill Smith (-4) challenge to put a Woodham point on the board, and then the fun began and there was no time for a bath whatsoever as we hit final set mayhem.
Woodham pairing Tim Pulham (-5) and Scott Perry (-5) won the next doubles 21-17 in the decider, and then Smith found redemption following his earlier loss by taking Perry to a final leg and winning out 21-17. It was very late in the evening by now and Mapledene needed just one more win to progress. The next singles saw Woodhamâ€s Dadswell take the opening leg against Lin Roff (-6), but Roff fought back with a 21-17 second leg to tie up the match. It took a while for Roff to catch up the handicap in the final leg but once she did she was able to secure and maintain the lead for a 21-16 win for a game, set, and overall match declaration.
Cold Norton have three teams in the quarter-finals and look to have the handicap bit between their teeth for this one. Next round is played week of 15 December.
By Thierry Verviers
The concept is simple: mixed teams (men and women). But the real revolution is in the scoring system.
Each match—whether singles or doubles—is played best-of-three (first to 2 games). But the team encounter doesnâ€t end after three match wins. Instead, it stops the moment one team reaches 8 total games won.
What does that change?
Everything.
There are no more dead rubbers. Every game counts. Winning 2–1 versus 2–0 immediately impacts the overall score. This keeps the tension high from the first serve to the final point.
For coaches, this is a laboratory.
This is where weâ€ll see what truly works. Coaches must manage players differently. A best-of-3 specialist—someone who starts strong and fast—becomes crucial.
Weâ€ll also get a preview of the best serve/receive patterns and short-game strategies (2–3 shots), because every point is decisive. This format is pedagogical gold for building our training plans.
Itâ€s also worth noting: this is the format selected for the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games. What happens in Chengdu is the blueprint for the next four years.
The heavy hitters will be there. This is one to watch closely.
More information:
– Player List Announced for ITTF Mixed Team World Cup 2025 in Chengdu (ITTF)
– Tickets for ITTF Mixed Team World Cup 2025 in Chengdu Go on Sale This Week (ITTF)
– ITTF Mixed Team World Cup Chengdu 2025 – Tournament Hub (ITTF)
– ITTF Mixed Team World Cup 2024: Format (best-of-3 / 8 games) – International Table Tennis Federation
The National Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, N.Y., is where the sport’s legends live forever.
But how do those legends make it to Cooperstown in the first place? There are two ways:
Players can be elected to the Hall of Fame via the Baseball Writers’ Association of America ballot or via an Era Committee ballot.
With the 2026 BBWAA Hall of Fame ballot set to be released Monday, here is everything you need to know about Hall of Fame voting.
Who is eligible to cast a BBWAA ballot?
Only active and honorary members of the Baseball Writers†Association of America who have been active baseball writers for at least 10 years are eligible to vote. They must have been active as baseball writers and members of the BBWAA for at least 10 years before the date of the election in which they are voting.
In 2024, 394 BBWAA members cast a Hall of Fame ballot.
How often does the BBWAA vote on Hall of Fame candidates?
The BBWAA, which has been electing players to the Hall of Fame since 1936, has been voting on each new class of candidates annually since 1966.
Which players are eligible for the BBWAA ballot?
Any player who played in at least 10 Major League seasons and ended their MLB playing career at least five calendar years before the next election is eligible to be placed on that year’s ballot.
For example, pitcher Cole Hamels made his big league debut in 2006 and participated in 15 seasons, last playing in 2020. Thus, he is an eligible first-year candidate for the 2026 BBWAA ballot.
Who decides which players make the final ballot?
The most recent BBWAA ballots have included 25-30 players, so not every player who had a 10-plus-year career and has been retired for at least five years can be put on the ballot. The final say lies with a BBWAA-appointed screening committee consisting of baseball writers. It’s a six-member committee, and an eligible first-time candidate makes it on the ballot if they are nominated by any two of the six members.
Those ballot newcomers are joined by any player who received a vote on at least 5% of ballots cast in the previous election.
What are the voting procedures?
Ballots are mailed to each BBWAA elector during the latter half of November. An elector can vote for as few as zero and as many as 10 players on their ballot. Each elector must then sign their ballot and return it by Dec. 31 for it to be counted. The voting results of the BBWAA ballot for the Class of 2026 will be announced Jan. 20 on MLB Network.
How many votes are required for a player to be elected to the Hall of Fame or remain on the ballot?
Players who didn’t receive the amount of votes necessary for election must receive at least 5% of the vote in order to remain on the ballot. Any player who receives a vote on fewer than 5% ballots cast will no longer be considered by the BBWAA for the Hall of Fame.
How long can players remain on the BBWAA ballot?
Players can remain on the ballot for 10 years, assuming they receive at least 5% of the vote each year. If a player isn’t elected after 10 years on the ballot, they will no longer be considered by the BBWAA for the Hall of Fame.
How many players have been elected to the Hall of Fame via the BBWAA ballot?
The BBWAA has elected 137 players to the Hall, as of 2025.
Which player received the highest percentage of votes on the BBWAA ballot?
ERA COMMITTEE BALLOT VOTING
What are the Era Committees?
Formerly known as the Veterans Committee, the Era Committees consider retired Major League players who are no longer eligible for Hall of Fame election by the BBWAA, along with managers, umpires and executives.
There are three Era Committee ballots:
There are 16 members on each committee, consisting of Hall of Famers, current and former MLB executives, media members and historians. The committee members change each year.
How often does an Era Committee vote on Hall of Fame Candidates?
The Era Committees rotate on a three-year cycle, with one ballot being considered each year.
Who decides which players make the final ballot?
The Historical Overview Committee, which is appointed by the BBWAA, serves as the screening committee, consisting of 10-12 representatives. It identifies eight candidates for each year’s Era Committee ballot.
Who is on this year’s Era Committee Ballot?
The Contemporary Baseball Era Committee player ballot is up for consideration this year. The eight Hall candidates on the ballot are Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Carlos Delgado, Jeff Kent, Don Mattingly, Dale Murphy, Gary Sheffield and Fernando Valenzuela.
What are the voting procedures?
For 2025, the Contemporary Era Committee will meet on Dec. 7 at baseballâ€s Winter Meetings in Orlando to consider this year’s eight candidates. Each committee member may vote for as few as zero and as many as three of the eight candidates on the ballot. The voting results will be announced live that night on MLB Network at 7:30 ET.
How many votes are required for a player to be elected to the Hall of Fame or remain on the ballot?
Candidates who receive a vote on 12 of the 16 ballots cast (75%) are elected to the Hall of Fame and are included in the following year’s induction ceremony in Cooperstown. Per a 2025 rule change, any candidate on an Era Committee ballot who does not receive at least five votes from the 16-member committee will not be eligible to be placed back on that ballot in its next three-year cycle. But a candidate can return to an Era Committee ballot after skipping one cycle.
For example, if one of the candidates on the 2025 Contemporary Baseball Era Committee player ballot receives fewer than 5 votes, they wouldn’t be eligible for the next such ballot in 2028. However, they would be eligible to be placed back on that ballot in 2031.
Any candidate who receives fewer than five votes on multiple Era Committee ballots will no longer be eligible for future consideration.