Browsing: Legal

The Rules of Golf are tricky! Thankfully, we’ve got the guru. Our Rules Guy knows the book front to back. Got a question? He’s got all the answers.

I was playing in a tournament where a competitor would move his mark from behind his ball to about two inches to the side of the ball before putting. Only after the stroke would he pick up his marker. Is that legal? Does it matter if he’s using it as some kind guide versus just being lazy? – Jerry Cunningham, via email

Your darn tootin’, it matters!

By removing the marker, the player is doing what Rule 14.1 tells him and making sure the stroke isn’t made with the ball marker still in place.

But then, why place it to the side in a consistent manner? If he’s using it as some sort of swing aide unrelated to alignment, that would be a problem under Rule 4.3; the first time he made a stroke that way would be the general penalty and the second time, disqualification.

If he’s placing the marker there to help with alignment, aiming or in taking his stance, he would be in breach of Rule 10.2b(3) and get the general penalty each time. If he’s just being lazy, well, then he’s just being lazy.

For more marking guidance from our guru, read on …

two golf balls collide

Rules Guy: My playing partner’s ball collided with mine before I could mark. Now what?

By:

Rules Guy

I came up about five feet short of the green on my approach shot, and the grass was short enough that I decided to putt. The problem: My buddy had also come up short, three feet ahead of my ball, directly in my putting line. I asked him to mark his ball. He refused, saying that you aren’t allowed to mark your ball anywhere but on the green. I asked him to play first. He refused again, claiming the rules dictated the farther ball be played first, while also admitting that he didn’t want to give me a read. I ended up chipping over his ball. But was he correct about the marking? – Name withheld, via e-mail

Please let me introduce you and your rather uncharitable buddy (lawyer, perchance?) to Rule 15.3b, which states that if a ball is interfering with one’s play, you have the right to have it lifted anywhere on the course.

Once you have made this request, the other player is obligated to lift the ball; in stroke play, he or she has the choice to play first rather than lift. He or she may not, however, plead the fifth.

Want to find the right gear for your bag in 2025?Find a club-fitting location near you at True Spec Golf.

Got a question about the Rules? Ask the Rules Guy! Send your queries, confusions and comments to rulesguy@golf.com. We promise he won’t throw the book at you.

blank

Former WWE CEO Vince McMahon was charged with one count of reckless driving and one count of following too closely, resulting in a motor accident over the summer.

TMZ broke the news that his charges were going to be dropped as he was willing to participate in a special program where he had to meet some conditions. A Stamford judge allowed the former WWE Chairman into an accelerated pre-trial rehabilitation program that would ensure that if McMahon kept his nose clean, donated $1,000 to charity, and adhered to driving lawfully, his case would be tossed out in October 2026.

Fans Greet Former WWE CEO Vince McMahon Outside The Courthouse

Vince McMahon was surrounded by many fans outside the courthouse. The fans apparently wanted to get his autograph, with one X/Twitter user stating that eBay resellers were also part of this group.

They were stalking the courthouse to get McMahon to sign a bunch of stuff. The 80-year-old obliged, quietly signing each of them before walking into the building.

You can WATCH the video in the tweet below:

After Marissa Alter originally posted the video above, many fans online were astounded by the people who seemingly did not find Vince McMahon appalling. Nobody has forgotten the allegations of the Janel Grant lawsuit, which were made public in January 2024, deeply affecting the former WWE CEO’s reputation.

It also forced McMahon to step down from his role as the Executive Chairman of the Board in TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of WWE and UFC.

Interestingly, Brock Lesnar is back on television. He was brought back at SummerSlam to kickstart a program with John Cena, one that culminated at Wrestlepalooza, WWE’s debut show on ESPN. The Beast dominated Cena en route to defeating the 17-time World Champion. Lesnar is expected to do more shows in 2026.

While the former UFC Heavyweight Champion’s comeback sparked controversy, it has proved to be a massive commercial success for WWE.

Source link

blank

Business mogul and former WWE CEO Vince McMahon has won a legal battle.

Vince McMahon was charged with one count of reckless driving and one count of following too closely, resulting in a motor accident over the summer. However, police confirmed everyone was wearing their seatbelts, and so no one sustained any injuries.

As reported by TMZ, McMahon was given the opportunity to have the charges against him dropped in a year by participating in a special program where he had to meet some conditions. A Stamford judge allowed the former WWE Chairman into an accelerated pre-trial rehabilitation program that would ensure that if McMahon kept his nose clean, donated $1,000 to charity, and adhered to driving lawfully, his case would be tossed out in October 2026.

Former WWE CEO Vince McMahon’s Attorney Calls The Outcome “Good News”

Vince McMahon appeared in court for the proceedings, wearing a navy suit and white shirt. He did not speak. McMahon’s attorney, Mark Sherman, told TMZ, “It was good news.” Sherman further noted, “Not every car accident is a crime, and the judge agreed that he deserved this dismissal, and we’re grateful for that.”

Vince McMahon Celebrated His 80th Birthday In August; Major WWE Names Attended The Party

Vince McMahon turned 80 on August 24. As per PWInsider, major names such as Kane, The Undertaker, John Cena, Gerald Brisco, Michelle McCool, Bruce Prichard, JBL, Sgt. Slaughter, Shane McMahon, Sheamus, and Ron Killings (R-Truth), among others, were in attendance for McMahon’s party.

Meanwhile, Brock Lesnar, who was named in former WWE employee Janel Grant’s lawsuit against McMahon, has returned to WWE. He resurfaced at SummerSlam, before destroying John Cena at Wrestlepalooza, World Wrestling Entertainment’s debut show on ESPN. It remains to be seen how the former UFC fighter will get booked going forward. Furthermore, what will be the fate of Vince McMahon? Only time will tell.

Source link

Following Andrade El Idolo’s return to AEW earlier this month, his sudden disappearance from television has been a topic of speculation. A new report suggests his absence may be due to a non-compete clause with WWE. On the October 16 edition of Wrestling Observer Radio, Dave Meltzer stated that the belief is WWE intervened.

“What Iâ€ve been hearing was WWE sent a letter. AEW obviously believed that there was no non-compete,” Meltzer said. “There were people who talked to people in WWE who also believed there was no non-compete. But WWE apparently… thatâ€s the story. They said that he canâ€t do (anything in AEW) for 90 days.”

This information aligns with a previous report from Fightful Select, which noted that sources close to Andrade said he was in “good spirits” but did not explain his absence. The report also mentioned that the situation was not seen as “AEW or Andradeâ€s specific fault.”

The assumption was that Andrade was free of any restrictions due to the circumstances of his WWE release. However, this new development indicates WWE believes he is still within the standard 90-day non-compete window for main roster talent. Andrade’s future in AEW appears to be on a temporary hold, not because of creative decisions or injury, but due to a potential legal complication with his former employer. AEW has not commented on the matter publicly.

Source link