Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
- CM Punk And Two Female WWE Stars Get Matching Tattoos
- Kevin Durant getting $90M Rockets extension, $30M under max
- WWE Accused of Abusing One-Sided Contracts Amid Andrade Non-Compete Drama
- Inside his India Championship-winning bag
- Politics Could Derail Nakamura vs Tanahashi at Tokyo Dome 2026
- Australia vs India: Virat Kohli & Rohit Sharma out cheaply as hosts win rain-affected first ODI
- Is Mason Mount what Man United, Amorim have been missing?
- Toni Storm Likely Headed to AEW Womenâ€s Tag Division After WrestleDream Loss
Browsing: abusing
Andradeâ€s AEW return may have lit a spark, but WWE was quick to pour cold water on it—and now the real heat is coming from someone whoâ€s been watching it all unfold with a critical eye.
Stevie Richards didnâ€t hold back during a recent episode of The Stevie Richards Show, where he slammed WWEâ€s controversial use of one-year non-compete clauses, especially in Andradeâ€s case. According to Richards, WWE is manipulating its power and contract language to keep talent from gaining traction elsewhere—even if it means keeping them sidelined without a paycheck.
“A one-year no-compete, though, man, thatâ€s beyond the pale, especially when we still argue to this day — are they independent contractors or are they employees? Theyâ€re independent contractors when itâ€s convenient for WWE; theyâ€re employees when itâ€s even more convenient for WWE. WWE wants to abuse this clause whenever they want to, especially with Andrade.â€
Richards believes WWEâ€s “just cause†clause is way too vague and easily exploitable. He pointed out that even something as minor as disagreeing with a storyline could be twisted into grounds for punishment.
“What constitutes just cause? What if somebody refuses to do a storyline thatâ€s against their morals or character? WWE could call that insubordination and use it to ban them for a year. Can this be manipulated by the company? Oh, absolutely.â€
He also likened WWEâ€s strategy to the NFLâ€s morality clause but argued that WWE takes it even further by silencing and freezing talent under the guise of policy.
“Everybody manipulates this type of morality clause in the NFL. If you send out a tweet or anything happens that they donâ€t like, they can suspend you or ban you. This makes the professional wrestling contract, somehow — and I didnâ€t think it was possible — even more one-sided in favor of the promoter and not the talent.â€
According to Richards, itâ€s not just about wrestling. WWEâ€s grip could even stop Andrade from branching into MMA or Hollywood, thanks to the intentionally vague contract language.
“If Andrade even wanted to do MMA, heâ€s not allowed to do that. It encompasses anything combat sport or even entertainment… Say you wanted to be an action star — isnâ€t that considered a mix between entertainment and combat sports?â€
Andrade reportedly has legal representation on standby, and thereâ€s speculation that WWEâ€s non-compete clause could be challenged in court, especially if theyâ€re withholding pay. If the clause is ruled unenforceable under U.S. labor law, it could blow a massive hole in WWEâ€s contract model.
Richards closed by calling out what he sees as a blatant abuse of power meant to weaken stars†momentum before they can benefit another promotion.
“Itâ€s obviously set up so that in three months, in the wrestling universe, you lose a lot of steam. So, they do not want you going to a competing promotion… that actually, in itself, shows they want to protect the competition from capitalizing on any steam, push, or momentum that a talent had in WWE.â€
This isnâ€t just about Andrade—itâ€s about the entire power dynamic between WWE and its talent. Wrestlers are increasingly expected to live with zero leverage while WWE maintains all the control.
This could be the legal battle that opens the door for change—or just another example of how deep WWEâ€s grip on its performers really runs.
Please credit Ringside News if you use the above transcript in your publication.
Do you think WWEâ€s contract system is due for a complete overhaul? Please share your thoughts and feedback in the comment section below.
The European team were expecting abuse from the people paying to attend this Ryder Cup, but not from the people the Ryder Cup are paying to entertain them while they are here. In a dismal start to what turned into one of the most rancorous day’s play in the history of the competition, the female master of ceremonies employed to inject some life into the crowd at the 1st tee was recorded using a megaphone to lead a chant of “Fuck you Rory!†before Saturday morning’s foursomes. The PGA of America, which is organising the tournament, was approached for comment but remained oddly silent until late on Saturday evening when they issued an apology and announced that the MC, Heather McMahan, would stand down from Sunday’s proceedings.
The incident set the tone for everything that happened after. The words became a recurring chant, and by the end of the day the atmosphere around his fourball with Shane Lowry against Justin Thomas and Cameron Young had become so foul that the PGA of America had brought in a squad of state police to try to restore order.
It has to be said McIlroy has not helped himself. During his Friday fourball, he flipped his finger at a heckler while he was walking off the 11th green after Lowry had made a putt to put the team 2 up. On Saturday, McIlroy responded to the chants on the 1st tee by blowing kisses at the crowd. But he finally snapped when he reached the 16th during his foursomes match with Tommy Fleetwood. Someone shouted out: “Freedom!†while McIlroy was getting ready to make his swing. He turned to face the crowd and snapped back: “Shut the fuck up!†before he stepped back up to the ball and hit it to three feet from the pin.
“I don’t mind them having a go at us, that’s to be expected, that’s what an away Ryder Cup is,†said McIlroy after the round, although you guess he was being diplomatic given that a lot of what was said was about his wife and private life. “Whenever they are still doing it while you are over the ball and trying to hit your shot, that’s the tough thing. You know, look, in between shots, say whatever you want to me. That’s totally fine. But just give us the respect to let us hit shots. Give us the same chance that the Americans have.†It did not make any difference.
Quick GuideRyder Cup singles pairings and timingsShow
12.02 EDT/17.02 BST Cameron Young v Justin Rose
12.13 EDT/17.13 BST Justin Thomas v Tommy Fleetwood
12.24 EDT/17.24 BST Bryson DeChambeau v Matt Fitzpatrick
12.35 EDT/17.35 BST Scottie Scheffler v Rory McIlroy
12.46 EDT/17.46 BST Patrick Cantlay v Ludvig Ã…berg
12.57 EDT/17.57 BST Xander Schauffele v Jon Rahm
13.08 EDT/18.08 BST JJ Spaun v Sepp Straka
13.19 EDT/18.19 BST Russell Henley v Shane Lowry
13.30 EDT/18.30 BST Ben Griffin v Rasmus Højgaard
13.41 EDT/18.41 BST Collin Morikawa v Tyrrell Hatton
13.52 EDT/18.52 BST Sam Burns v Robert MacIntyre
14.03 EDT/19.03 BST Harris English v Viktor Hovland
Thank you for your feedback.
During McIlroy’s afternoon fourball match he had to step away from a putt because the crowd were making so much noise. This time it was his partner Lowry who reacted, shouting: “Fuck you!†after making his own putt to win the hole from 20ft. By the time the match reached the 8th, Thomas had started asking the crowd to quieten down when Lowry and McIlroy were over the ball, and the PGA of America had finally started posting frequent spectator etiquette warnings up on the big screens around the grounds. They were booed every time they appeared.
“It’s really, really challenging,†McIlroy said when it was all over. He refused to be drawn on whether he thought the crowd had gone too far. “It’s not for me to say, people can be their own judge.†The look on Lowry’s face while he said it told you everything you needed to know about his verdict on it.
skip past newsletter promotion
The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend’s action
Privacy Notice:Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
Either way, the crowd were picking on the wrong man. McIlroy won his foursomes 3&2, and his fourball 2 up, by the time he had walked off 18 at the end of the day he had won as many points on his own as the entire US team had between them. In the absence of many eagles and birdies, US golf did not have anything much else left to throw at him but insults.