Logan Paul isnâ€t playing games when it comes to his collectibles—especially when over half a million dollars is involved. The YouTuber-turned-WWE-star has filed a lawsuit in Texas over concerns that he may have been sold a fake piece of Michael Jordan history.
According to ESPN, Paul recently filed an injunction against Heritage Auctions after winning a $562,555.42 auction for an 8-by-8-foot section of the Chicago Bulls†United Center court, allegedly signed and used by Jordan during the 1994–98 seasons. The piece includes multiple inscriptions from MJ himself, including “Air Jordan,†“5X MVP,†“6X Finals MVP,†and “HOF 2009.â€
Heritage claims the floor was game-used from the arenaâ€s debut through 2005–06 and backs the sale with certificates of authenticity from Upper Deck Authentication, PSA/DNA, and Beckett. But Logan Paul isnâ€t convinced and wants answers—legally.
His legal team says Paul wasnâ€t given a fair chance to verify the piece before being pressured to pay by the September 25 deadline. His lawyer, Josh Bernstein of Akerman LLP, made their position clear:
“It goes without saying that authenticity is everything in the collectibles community. Collectors like Logan deserve, and are entitled to, proof of authenticity that holds up under scrutiny and addresses glaring holes and inconsistencies.â€
In court documents, Paul points out that the wood design doesnâ€t appear to match the 1995–98 court. The filing also questions whether the floor was resurfaced, repainted, or replaced—and raises doubts about whether the timeline Heritage gave holds up.
Emails included in the court filing show Heritage admitting they donâ€t have documentation linking the piece to the 1998–2001 seasons. Their photo-matching team could only verify the Bulls logo, not the unique wood grain—raising red flags.
A judge has already granted a temporary restraining order, freezing the sale while the case plays out in court. Heritage isnâ€t backing down and insists the item is the real deal.
“We stand behind every item that we sell… This lot would not have been included for sale at auction unless we were fully confident in its authenticity.â€
For Paul, this fight isnâ€t just about one item—itâ€s about setting a precedent for how high-value sports memorabilia should be verified. As the court prepares to hear the case on October 9, the outcome could shape future standards in the collectibles world.
Was Logan Paul right to press pause on the payment and take this to court? Do you think auction houses need stricter rules for authenticity? Let us know in the comments—we want your take.
September 26, 2025 6:09 am
Source link